Friday, April 19, 2013

“There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. He came as a witness, to bear witness about the light, that all might believe through him. He was not the light, but came to bear witness about the light.” – John 1:6-7

Courtney and I watched “The Life of Pi” (spoiler alert) a few days ago. I really enjoyed the movie-partly because I am fascinated with animals and partly because it was simply an intriguing story. The movie consists of a man (Pi) who tells the story of how he survived a shipwreck as a boy and remained alive at sea for 277 days. The story includes a zebra, a hyena, an orangutan, a strange island with a colony of unusual meerkats, and most importantly, Richard Parker, a Bengal tiger. Once Pi is finally rescued, he is asked by two investigators to share his testimony of what happened to him, the ship, and all of its passengers. The testmony Pi tells the investigators describes the unusual circumstances that allowed him to survive with only a raft and its contents for the nearly a year in the Pacific Ocean. His audience, though, is not satisfied with his witness acount and they press him to tell them the "real" story, namely, one that is easy to believe. Grudgingly, Pi tells the investigators a different story, which includes no wild animals or strange islands. Neither story gives an explanation of why the ship sank, but both of them explained how he survived. Pi, the only witness to the tragedy, has told two stories and it is up to the investigators to decide which one they prefer.
John the Baptist found himself in a very similar predicament to Pi. His testimony did not have to do with a disastrous shipwreck or survival at sea, but it had to do with the tragedy of human sin, and the only way to life. God had been silent for over 400 years and the people of Judea were losing hope, wondering if the promised Messiah would ever come to deliver them. John the Baptist's testimony was that the King was indeed coming, and he urged the people to prepare themselves for his arrival. John proclaimed the arrival of Jesus, God in the flesh (John 1:14), the Lord (John 1:23) who would be the Saviour of the world(Luke 3:3). Much like Pi's interrogators, however, the Jews had a hard time with the story and the explanation of this witness. If the Jews were going to believe John, it would require them to recognize their own darkness and their need to be rescued by the light. It would require them to realize that their biggest problem was not the Roman occupation over the Jewish people, but it was their own sin. In other words, they would need to understand that Jesus was not going to deliver them from a Gentile ruler, but from an inherited predisposition-their own sinfulness.

Pi changed his original testimony after seeing the investigators' dissatisfaction with his account. John the Baptist held firm to his testimony and did not offer an alternative version of reality despite the frustration and eventual anger of the people around him. He was not interested in changing his account because he knew that the eternal life of his hearers depended on whether or not they believed his testimony about who Jesus was.

An important difference between Pi and John as witnesses is that Pi was the only reliable witness that could explain the tragedy in the Pacific. John, on the other hand, was only one of hundreds of first-account, reliable, coherent witnesses of the man Jesus Christ. While the investigators in the movie had one and only one strange testimony go on, the Jews in John's day and all of us today have hundreds of first-person, reliable, and coherent accounts to help us understand and believe in the Son of God, the Saviour of the world.